Berkeley Lab Study Finds Big Energy Savings in The New York Times Building
Designing a building holistically, and making sure that its components and systems work together according to design intent, can pay big dividends in energy savings and occupant satisfaction, according to a Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) study of the performance of The New York Times Building in New York City.
Measured results from the post-occupancy evaluation showed a 24 percent reduction in annual electricity use and a 51 percent reduction in heating energy use, compared to expectations from a design that just met the prescriptive energy-efficiency code in effect at the time of construction (ASHRAE 90.1-2001), and a 25 percent reduction in peak electric demand. In addition, a significant fraction of occupants indicated a high level of satisfaction with the overall building and its design features. The Times Company's investment in advanced energy-efficiency technologies is estimated to yield a 12 percent rate of return on their initial investment.
"We aggressively pursued innovative designs to improve the quality of the workplace for our employees and to reduce energy use and other operating costs of our facility," said Angelo Salvatore, executive director of building operations at the Times Company, "and the outcomes of this study confirm that we were successful. More importantly, our hope is that the energy-efficient measures and designs documented in this independent study may inspire other companies' workplace designs."
Located near Times Square in New York, the 52-story building has 1.5 million square feet of commercial office space, and the Times Company has occupied floors 2 through 21 since the building's opening in 2007. A Berkeley Lab research team from its Environmental Energy Technologies Division (EETD) began working with the Times Company in 2003 to design, evaluate, and specify an integrated solution with energy-efficient lighting and automated shading systems for the windows in a full-scale mockup at a nearby Times Company site in Queens. The goal of the 18-month collaboration at the mockup, supported by The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), was to determine whether the advanced technologies could provide comfortable working conditions for the building occupants while maximizing energy savings. The test results in the mockup led to new performance specifications, a positive response from the manufacturing community, and ultimately the incorporation of these high-performance lighting, shading, and HVAC systems into the final building design. The completed building was occupied in 2007.
Since its completion, and because of the innovations incorporated into the design, the Times Building has attracted a lot of attention in the architectural and energy-efficiency community. The key unanswered question for this building, and most buildings, is "how is it performing?"
Members of the Berkeley Lab team and collaborators from the University of California, Berkeley's Center for the Built Environment assisted with the commissioning of the innovative HVAC system. They returned to the Times Building in 2011 and 2012 as part of their participation in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Commercial Buildings Partnership (CBP) program to conduct a monitored evaluation of three installed energy-efficiency measures: dimmable lighting, automated interior roller shades, and the underfloor air distribution system (UFAD). The CBP aims to demonstrate validated, cost-effective low-energy technologies and systems that can be widely replicated nationwide in both new construction and retrofit projects in the commercial buildings market.
Designing from a system point of view yields best results
"The message of our study," says Eleanor Lee, the project's Principal Investigator, "is that by designing the building holistically—that is, considering the energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality, new technologies, and other factors like interior design and aesthetic appearance of the building together, you can achieve very high occupant satisfaction, as well as significant energy efficiency." It is not just designing for energy efficiency, but following through in the execution stages that lead to a successful result.
"During construction and after," Lee adds, "the Times Company facilities staff took the time to make sure the building was constructed according to design intent, and they commissioned the building before its opening—testing and adjusting the building's systems to ensure that they were performing properly. After the building opened, they continued to monitor the building's operation and made small adjustments to improve performance."
In an occupied building, for technical and practical reasons, the energy use of each system of interest cannot always be directly measured. To evaluate this building, the research team measured energy use and other data from the automated shading system, dimmable lighting system, and underfloor air distribution system on a typical floor in the building, and gathered other data throughout the building. The team used the measured data to calibrate the EnergyPlus model, then used the model to predict annual energy savings. (EnergyPlus is building simulation software developed by Berkeley Lab.) They also used occupant survey data, which was conducted for another report and gathered by Sustainable Energy Partnerships, to evaluate the success of the building in maintaining comfortable working conditions.
Dimmable lights with setpoint and sensors save energy
The building uses automatically dimmable lighting controls together with an automated shading system to minimize energy use and maximize occupant comfort. Occupancy-based controls turn off light fixtures eight minutes after occupants leave the area. The digitally addressable, dimmable lighting system enables staff to tune the lighting to their preferred lighting levels (called setpoint tuning). Whenever the daylight is present in the perimeter areas, the lighting control system dims or turns off the overhead lights automatically.
Annual lighting energy use savings from the lighting control strategies (occupancy, setpoint tuning, and daylighting) was 56 percent (3.94 kWh/ft2-yr) across a 40-foot deep perimeter zone compared to a code-compliant building with only the standard scheduled lighting controls.
The Sustainable Energy Partnerships survey results report that 57 percent of the occupants responded with greater-than-neutral satisfaction with the automatic lighting controls (occupancy sensors, dimming in response to daylight conditions). Seventy-eight percent of the occupants were very satisfied with the overall quality of the lighting in their workspace from daylight and the overhead lighting system. (The average rating was 5.53 on a 7-point scale, where a value of 4 is neutral.)
Automated shading system keeps sunlight within acceptable range
The automated motorized shading system regulates sunlight entering through the windows to reduce cooling, and can reduce glare from the sky. Its control algorithm is programmed to maximize incoming natural light but minimize the negative effects of glare and direct sunlight on occupant comfort. The system is also designed so that occupants can override the automatic system and raise or lower the shades if they are not satisfied with their environmental conditions.
The automated shading enabled lighting and cooling energy use reductions, and reductions in peak electric demand. Energy savings due to the shading system alone could not be measured directly, but the reduction in annual site energy use due to the combination of the three systems was estimated to be 26 percent (10.17 kBtu/ft2-yr) across a typical tower floor compared to a code-compliant building.
Occupants on all floors overrode the automated shading system infrequently. For motors overridden at least once, 80% of these motors were overridden an average of 18 times per year (1.5% of the year), for an average total time of 38 hours per year during primary work hours. Forty-one percent of the occupants responded with slightly greater-than-neutral satisfaction with the automatic window shades, with an average rating on all 20 floors of 4.12 on a 7 point scale.
Underfloor air distribution system adds to comfort and energy benefits
A UFAD system distributes air from the plenum under the floor to ventilate and condition the space above. It helps save air conditioning energy by maintaining comfortable conditions in the lower occupied zone of the space, while allowing warmer and less comfortable conditions to exist in the higher-space elevations. The air conditioning setpoint can be higher (therefore lowering the airflow and reducing cooling) while still allowing the average conditions in the occupied zone to remain comfortable.
Temperature measurements in the interior zone showed a reasonable amount of air stratification (2°F–3°F difference between standing head height [67 in.] and ankle height [4 in.]) in the occupied zone—an indicator of good UFAD cooling performance.
Design, engineering, and follow-through on intent for better performance
"The care that the Times Company took to design, engineer, and follow through on the design intent behind the energy-efficiency measures and the actual performance of the technological measures themselves led to the building's meeting its goals for occupant comfort," says Lee. "A high percentage of building occupants said they felt that the new building enhanced their ability to do their job." Energy efficiency and occupant satisfaction are being achieved without an increase in operating expense. After some fine-tuning of the systems for a year after occupancy, Patrick Whelan, the Times Company's facilities director, said that maintenance and operations needs for the three systems were surprisingly minimal given the advanced technology incorporated into the three systems.
This study confirms that office buildings in an urban environment can deliver measured energy performance that substantially beats the energy codes with a combination of smart design, efficient technology, and properly integrated building systems, carried from design to construction and commissioning and into operations. The Times Company did its homework in 2004, well before the construction of the building, evaluating the shading and daylighting technologies in a 4,500 ft2 full-scale mockup prior to installation in the actual building. Improved design tools and evolving building systems allow designers to capture the performance benefits without the use of such sophisticated studies. The lesson for replicating the success of this building on a large scale is that the technologies and systems solutions are available, but it is essential to pay attention to details such as procurement of building equipment and verifying the proper performance of the equipment after it is installed.
The study was conducted by: Eleanor S. Lee, Luis L. Fernandes, Brian Coffey, Andrew McNeil, and Robert Clear (Berkeley Lab) and Tom Webster, Fred Bauman, Darryl Dickerhoff, David Heinzerling, and Tyler Hoyt (Center for the Built Environment, University of California, Berkeley). It had support from the U.S. Department of Energy Commercial Buildings Partnership program and the California Energy Commission through its Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program. This DOE study incorporated findings on occupant response undertaken in a separate effort by Sustainable Energy Partnerships, with support from NYSERDA.
The report title is A Post-Occupancy Monitored Evaluation of the Dimmable Lighting, Automated Shading, and Underfloor Air Distribution System in The New York Times Building. Download the report here.
The U.S. Department of Energy and the California Energy Commission through its Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program provided funding for the research, along with in-kind support from The New York Times Company. The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority supported the occupancy survey, which began prior to the start of this research.