The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) helps federal agencies reduce energy bills and improve energy efficiency. FEMP criteria and the federal ENERGYSTAR® energy-efficiency labeling program identify efficient products, helping agencies make energy-efficient choices. State and local governments are among those now following the federal example. A growing number of jurisdictions have adopted energy-efficient purchasing policies, often using the same ENERGYSTAR and FEMP criteria that federal agencies are required to use.
The state of Arizona and the city and state of New York are among the most recent additions to a growing list of states, cities, universities, and school districts that are choosing to "buy efficient," often as part of a broader policy to "buy green" (i.e., choose environmentally preferable and recyclable products). According to the Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE), the 50 state governments and approximately 3,043 county, 19,279 city, and 16,656 town governments in the U.S. spend an estimated total $12 billion per year on energy bills and another $50 to 70 billion per year on energy-related products.
The magnitude of this buying power combined with that of the federal government could help jump-start a market transformation, increasing the demand for and availability of energy-efficient products. When major buyers at all levels of government use the same criteria to specify energy-efficient products, this sends a powerful market signal to manufacturers and vendors that some of their largest and most important customers are committed to buying high-efficiency products and are looking for sellers who can offer the best prices and best overall value for these products. In other words, aggregating buyer demand for energy-efficient products will stimulate a competitive market response that helps to lower prices and improve choices for all buyers of energy-efficient products, government and non-government alike.
A recent report prepared for FEMP by the Environmental Energy Technologies Division (EETD) at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) suggests that combined federal, state, and local purchasing could save U.S. taxpayers about $1 billion per year in lower energy bills if standard, minimal-efficiency products were replaced with more efficient (ENERGYSTAR or FEMP-recommended) models over a 10-year period. These savings would be obtained for the most part using funds that would be spent anyway, to replace equipment at the end of its useful life.
Both Executive Order 13123 and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 23 direct federal agencies to buy ENERGYSTAR-labeled products or, for categories where there is no ENERGYSTAR label, to choose FEMP-designated products that are among the 25 percent most energy-efficient on the market. A separate executive order (EO 13221), signed in 2001 by President Bush, calls on federal agencies to buy products that use less than one watt in standby (off) mode or that meet other low-standby-use criteria set by FEMP. Both executive orders allow exceptions if there is no efficient product available to meet the agency's functional requirements or if an efficient product would not be cost effective for a specific application.