Energy Efficiency: No-Regrets Climate Change Insurance for the Insurance Industry
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Technologies that Reduce the Likelihood of Insured Losses While Increasing Energy Efficiency

Many energy-efficient technologies offer non-energy benefits,[17] including reducing risk of such insured losses from fire, ice, water damage, temperature extremes, occupational injuries, problems resulting from poor indoor air quality, and uninsured drivers. By supporting the measures summarized in Table 1, the insurance industry could reduce the risk of such insured losses while promoting energy efficiency. We identify approximately 60 ways in which such losses could be reduced. In each case, the measures described will also reduce energy use and thus greenhouse-gas emissions, thereby addressing insurance-industry concerns about increased windstorm damage and the like.

Table 1. Potential for energy-efficient technologies to prevent insured losses.
Insured Risk Mitigated
Energy Efficiency Measure Fire
& Wind
Damage
Ice &
Water
Damage
Extreme
Temperature
Episodes
Power
Failures
Professional
Liability
Uninsured
Drivers
Health
& Safety
(Lighting)
Health
& Safety
(Indoor Air)
Air Vest for spray booths *
Building commissioning * * * * *
Central heating controls *
Compact fluorescent lamps *
Daylighting * *
Demand-controlled ventilation * *
Economizer cooling * *
Efficient appliances * * * *
Efficient duct systems * * * *
Efficient windows * *
Electronic lighting ballasts * *
Energy audits & diagnostics * * *
Extra interior gypsum board *
Heat-recovery ventilation * *
Insulated water pipes * *
LED exit signs * *
Light-colored roofs * * * *
Measurement & Verification * * * * *
Natural ventilation * *
Pay-As-You-Drive insurance *
Radiant barriers *
Radiant hydronic cooling * *
Radon-resistant housing *
Reduce indoor poll. sources * *
Roof/attic insulation * *
Sealed-combustion appliances * * *
Torchier light fixture with CFL *

Some benefits result from a single strategy targeting a specific end use, while others result from a host of measures, such as energy-efficiency improvements that have the side benefit of reducing electromagnetic fields (EMF) that are proportional to total current. (EMF-related claims are a growing concern for insurance companies.[18] ) Similarly, comprehensive strategies, such as uniform protocols for measurement and verification of energy savings and proper equipment performance, apply to a wide range of efficiency options.

The list presented below is not intended to be comprehensive, and the risk reductions described here are not well quantified in some cases. More in-depth study is needed. Care should be taken that new measures do not inadvertently introduce new sources of loss. In addition, it is important to note that the insurance industry has many sub-sectors: automobile, personal liability, etc., and not all measures described below are relevant to all sectors.

Reducing Fire & Wind Damage

Reducing Ice & Water Damage

Reducing Damage from Power Interruptions & Extreme Temperature Events

Figure 3. The bars indicate numbers of deaths each of the July 1995 heat wave in Chicago, and the curve shows the heat index, which reflects the combined effect of temperature and humidity.[29]

Figure 4. Computer-simulated indoor temperatures in the top floor of a prototypical 1940s two-story apartment building in Chicago during the July 1995 heatwave. In the existing building, top-floor temperatures reached 108ÁF and remained high even after the outdoor temperatures had started to drop. The addition of attic insulation, white paint on the roof, and a ventilation system brought top floor temperatures in line with outdoor temperatures.[30]

Reducing Professional Liability

Reducing Occupational Health and Safety Risks Related to Lighting

Reducing Indoor Air Quality Problems

People spend 90% of their time indoors, where concentrations of air pollutants can exceed outdoor levels.[41] There are at least six linkages between health/productivity and the indoor environment. Poor indoor air quality causes infections, disease, allergies/asthma, acute sick-building health symptoms,[42] poor worker performance, and electronic equipment failures. Evidence suggests that the insured health care and lost-productivity costs resulting from indoor air quality problems are substantial.

About 20,000 deaths and ten times as many illnesses in the U.S. each year are attributable to indoor air pollution. Although most of these deaths result from indoor exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, radon, and carbon monoxide, significant health problems can arise from other contributors to poor indoor air quality.

The cost of lost work days, restricted activity at work, and medical treatment for respiratory infections amounts to an estimated $65 billion per year in the U.S. alone. The corresponding cost for allergies and asthma is $13 billion each year and for sick building symptoms is $25 billion each year. A preliminary estimate indicates these costs could be reduced by $18 billion per year through building-related measures. Failure of electronic equipment has also been linked to indoor air contaminants, including 20% of circuit board failures, costing $200 million per year in U.S. telephone switching offices.[43]

Increasing ventilation rates (which increases energy use) is the most common strategy for coping with suspected indoor air quality problems. However, potentially more effective and energy-efficient strategies are also available. These include proper pressure balancing, efficient air filtration, reducing air recirculation, individual control of office environment, improving cleaning practices, and reducing indoor pollutant sources.

In addition to physical design changes to reduce the likelihood of indoor air quality problems, commissioning methods (discussed above) can ensure correct design and construction of building components, and effective response to problems following building occupancy. Specific opportunities for improving energy-efficiency while addressing indoor air quality risks include:

Figure 5. In 1994, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory designed, built and field-tested this in situ aerosol sealing apparatus. Besides performing the sealing process, the device also measures the leakage of the duct system before and after sealing. By injecting a fine aerosol, the device was found to seal approximately 60% of the leakage in the duct system in 15 minutes using only $6 worth of sealing material.

Figure 6. Photographs of prototypical Airvest with fan off (left) and on (right). The chart below shows that spray booth ventilation rates can be reduced by 50%, while pollutant exposure in the breathing zone of the worker is reduced by about 30-fold.

Figure 7. Seasonality of cooking fuel use decreased markedly following a heating controls retrofit in the Trenton Housing Authority.
Reduce indoor pollutant sources. This is perhaps the most reliable and energy-efficient way to mitigate indoor air quality problems. Pollutant sources range from radon gas leaking in through cracked basement walls to volatile organic compounds used in carpet glues to cigarette smoke. Reducing pollutant sources improves indoor air quality and occupant health and reduces the need for the energy-consumed to provide high rates of outside air supply.
Table of Contents | Summary | Potential Roles for the Insurance Industry in Increasing Energy End-Use Efficiency
Climate-Insurance Page