Indoor VOC's
Further Investigation of Ozone, Carpets and VOCs
Morrison and Nazaroff (2000) conducted laboratory
studies to measure ozone uptake on four samples of fresh and aired
out whole carpet and on the corresponding carpet fibers and backings.
Results were described in terms of reaction probability defined
as the rate of ozone loss on the surface normalized by the rate
of ozone-surface interactions. For whole carpet and carpet backing,
the apparent reaction probability was of the magnitude of 10-5
to 10-4 (i.e., one molecule of ozone reacted for every
100,000 to 10,000 molecules hitting the surface) when referenced
to the floor area that would be covered by carpet. Reaction probabilities
of the order of 10-7 to 10-6 were measured
on carpet fibers, referenced to the total estimated fiber area.
All of the materials tested exhibited aging such that the rate of
ozone uptake diminished with increasing cumulative exposure. Estimates
indicated that carpet might dominate painted walls and ceilings
in scavenging ozone from indoor air, even though the superficial
surface area of carpet is smaller than the area of the painted surfaces.
A physically based mathematical model was subsequently developed
to describe the mass transport and uptake of ozone on carpeting
(Morrison and Nazaroff, 2002b). An existing model
of particle deposition from turbulent flow to indoor surfaces was
extended to include surface resistance to the uptake of reactive
gases. Surface resistance was parameterized in terms of the measured
pollutant-surface reaction probability. The model predicted that
the deposition velocity of ozone onto carpet should lie in the range
of 0.016 to 0.064 cm/s, values that were consistent with field measurements.
Owing to its higher reaction probability, carpet backing was predicted
to consume approximately the same amount of ozone as the fibers
even though the surface area of the fibers was much higher.
Emission rates of aldehydes and other VOCs were measured in the
experiments with the ozone exposed and unexposed carpets described
above (Morrison and Nazaroff, 2002a). Surface
interactions of ozone with the carpets produced formaldehyde, acetaldehyde
and various C3 through C13 normal aldehydes as well as several unsaturated
aldehydes. Nonanal was the predominant aldehyde. All materials,
whether fresh or aired, exhibited strong secondary aldehyde emission
factors. Total aldehyde emission factors increased markedly with
ozone exposure from 1 to 70 µg/m2-h for unexposed materials
to 60 to 800 µg/m2-h for exposed materials. One exposed
carpet emitted about 200 µg/m2-h of 2-nonenal with ozone
exposure. This compound is of particular significance as it has
a very low odor threshold (0.15 ppb for trans-2-nonenal). It was
estimated that the emissions of 2-nonenal could persist over a period
of years at rates sufficient to impact room odors.