Evan Mills, Nathan Martin, & Jeffrey Harris
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
1 Cyclotron Rd.
Berkeley, CA 94720
Nils Borg
Borg & Co.
IAEEL
1998
This publication can be downloaded from this link and read using Adobe Acrobat.
If you don't have Adobe Acrobat, get it here:
Of the countries studied, some have very sophisticated in-house energy management programs, but as a rule, comprehensive programs are rare. The paper identifies a host of possible strategies for such programs. These are voluntary or mandatory approaches including: policies for purchasing or leasing of energy-efficient equipment, technology procurement, informational programs, standards, training, energy audits, demonstration projects, common performance or savings targets, and various financing methods. The paper outlines a few key strategies for governments that wish to introduce comprehensive in-house energy managemnt and training, and finally, life-cycle cost analysis in combination with budget allocations that need no or little additional funding.
The processes and motives leading toor not leading tothe creation of comprehensive energy management programs in the government sector are not well understood, and further research should help explain these processes. Suggested areas for further research are the effectiveness of various comprehensive strategies, and energy management activities in the government sector other than buildings.
Proceedings of the 1997 ECEEE Summer Study, Prague, Czech Republic, Panel 4, ID 150, pp. 1-24. European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (Copenhagen). Also available as Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report No. LBNL-40403. Berkeley. CA.